If AAP sits in the opposition in Delhi, it may get stronger,
as we wouldn't get to see of its true colours had it been ruling.
It, more or less, looks like AAP will, indeed, sit in the
opposition, what with its unwillingness to either give or take support to /
from Congress or BJP. It is likely to only grow stronger being in the
opposition, showcasing the deeds and misdeeds of the incumbent government
during its reign as the main opposition party.
While doing so, it will gain more support, and in popularity,
thus benefiting for the future elections, not just in Delhi.
In fact, it gaining enough seats to be the main opposition,
rather than being routed, or leading the race, has positioned itself as a
masterstroke that came as a providence.
Does the rout of Congress mark an imminent death of its
aura, or the weakening of the hold of the Gandhi household? The latter looks
more certain than the first, and a clearer picture of it should emerge after
the result of the 2014 general elections.
Shivraj Chouhan's victory in two constituencies will lead to
a by-election to the constituency which he vacates - which will entail in
(additional) cost. Who is responsible for this? Why should the tax payer bear
this cost for no fault of his, rather for the one candidate's who might not be
confident of winning in one constituency? Will there be a law which makes THAT
candidate accountable for the cost, and makes him, and not his party, pay for
the same?
No comments:
Post a Comment